Mathematical modeling in assessing the risk of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy.

Carotid endarterectomy is the main way to combat atherosclerosis of the carotid arteries, which disrupts cerebral circulation. The generally accepted marker of atherogenesis risk are hemodynamic indices associated with near-wall shear stress. The purpose of the work is to conduct a comparative analysis of hemodynamic indices in various carotid bifurcation models. The influence of a virtual change in the geometric shape of the model in order to optimize hemodynamic indices is also being studied. On the basis of computed angiography data, carotid bifurcation models are constructed, in which critical zones of hemodynamic indices are built using computational fluid dynamics. A comparative analysis of the critical zones for different classes of models is carried out. Comparison of averaged indices for critical zones between 'normal' and post-operative groups gave more than 5-x worse results for the latter. The same results for the near-bifurcation parts of the zones give a 25% better result for postoperative models. Virtual 'removal' of insignificant plaques leads to a deterioration of the indices of up to 40% in the places of the plaque's former location. The described method makes it possible to build the indices critical zones and compare them for various types of models. A technique for virtual changing the shape of a vessel (virtual surgery) is proposed. The novelty of the approach lies in the use for comparative analysis both real vessel models and hypothetical 'improved' virtual ones, as well in the proposed division of post-operative model's critical zones into subzones of different genesis.

Carotid Near-Occlusion: Surgical or Conservative Management? Retrospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Carotid near-occlusion (CNO) represents an anatomical-functional condition characterized by severe (more than 90%) internal carotid artery stenosis which can lead to a distal lumen diameter greater or less than 2 mm. CNO can be divided into a less severe subgroup (without lumen full collapse: diameter >2 mm) and a more severe subgroup (with lumen full collapse: diameter <2 mm). The decision for revascularization is still highly debated in Literature. The aim of the present multicenter retrospective study is to analyze the incidence of perioperative (30 days) and follow-up complications in 2 groups of patients with or without distal internal carotid lumen full collapse. METHODS: Between January 2011 and March 2023, in 5 Vascular Surgery Units, 67 patients (49 male, 73% and 18 females, 27%) with CNO underwent carotid endarterectomy: 28 (41.7%) with lumen diameter <2 mm and 39 (58.3%) with diameter >2 mm. 19 patients were symptomatic and 48 asymptomatic. The outcomes considered for comparative analysis were: perioperative neurological and cardiac complications, carotid restenosis or occlusion at follow-up. Both groups were homogeneous in terms of risk factors, morphological features and pharmacological treatments. RESULTS: In the group with lumen <2 mm, 3 perioperative major events (10.7%) occurred (1 ischemic stroke, 1 hemorrhagic stroke, 1 myocardial infarction) and 2 (7.1%) at follow-up (average 11 ± 14.5 months; 1 asymptomatic carotid occlusion, 1 hemodynamic restenosis treated with stenting). No event was recorded in the group with lumen >2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results CNO patients show different complication risk according to the presence or not of distal lumen collapse. The later seems to play a significant role in perioperative and follow-up complication rate. These results therefore support a surgical treatment only in patients with CNO without lumen full collapse.

Clinical Significance of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in Older Patients Over 80.

As the average life expectancy increases, neurosurgeons are likely to encounter patients aged 80 years and above with carotid stenosis; however, whether old age affects clinical post-treatment outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains inconclusive. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the outcomes following CEA or CAS in patients aged 80 years and above. This study included older over 80 years (n = 34) and younger patients (<80 years; n = 222) who underwent CEA or CAS between 2012 and 2022. All of them were followed up for a mean of 55 months. All-cause mortality, the incidence of vascular events, ability to perform daily activities, and nursing home admission rates were assessed. During follow-up periods, 34 patients (13.3%) died due to coronary artery disease, malignancy, and pneumonia, and the incidence was significantly higher in the elderly group than in the younger group (P = 0.03; HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.53-5.56). The incidence of vascular events did not differ between the older group (29.5%) and the younger group (26.9%, P = 0.58); however, the incidence was significantly higher in patients with high-intensity plaques than in those without that (P = 0.008; HR, 2.83, 95%CI, 1.27-4.87). The decline in the ability to perform daily activities and increased nursing home admission rates were high in elderly patients (P < 0.01). Although the mortality rate was higher in the elderly group, subsequent vascular events were comparable to that in the younger group. The results suggest that CEA and CAS are safe and useful treatments for carotid stenosis in older patients, especially to prevent ipsilateral ischemic stroke.

Alamandine attenuates oxidative stress in the right carotid following transverse aortic constriction in mice.

OBJECTIVE: Pressure overload can result in significant changes to the structure of blood vessels, a process known as vascular remodeling. High levels of tension can cause vascular inflammation, fibrosis, and structural alterations to the vascular wall. Prior research from our team has demonstrated that the oral administration of alamandine can promote vasculoprotective effects in mice aorta that have undergone transverse aortic constriction (TAC). Furthermore, changes in local hemodynamics can affect the right and left carotid arteries differently after TAC. Thus, in this study, we aimed to assess the effects of alamandine treatment on right carotid remodeling and the expression of oxidative stress-related substances induced by TAC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Male C57BL/6 mice were categorized into three groups: Sham, TAC, and TAC treated with alamandine (TAC+ALA). Alamandine treatment was administered orally by gavage (30 µg/kg/day), starting three days before the surgery, and continuing for a period of fourteen days. Morphometric analysis of hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections revealed that TAC induced hypertrophic and positive remodeling in the right carotid artery. Picrosirius Red staining also demonstrated an increase in total collagen deposition in the right carotid artery due to TAC-induced vascular changes. Alamandine treatment effectively prevented the increase in reactive oxygen species production and depletion of nitric oxide levels, which were induced by TAC. Finally, alamandine treatment was also shown to prevent the increased expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 and 3-nitrotyrosine that were induced by TAC. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that alamandine can effectively attenuate pathophysiological stress in the right carotid artery of animals subjected to TAC.

Accelerated Measurement of Carotid Plaque Volume Using Artificial Intelligence Enhanced 3D Ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Carotid plaque volume (CPV) can be measured by 3D ultrasound and may be a better predictor of stroke than stenosis, but analysis time limits clinical utility. This study tested the accuracy, reproducibility, and time saved of using an artificial intelligence (AI) derived semiautomatic software to measure CPV ("auto-CPV"). METHODS: Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound images for 121 individuals were analyzed by 2 blinded operators to measure auto-CPV. Corresponding endarterectomy specimen volumes were calculated by the validated saline suspension technique. Inter-rater and intrarater agreement plus accuracy compared with the volume of the endarterectomized plaque were calculated. Measurement times were compared with previous manual CPV measurement. RESULTS: The mean difference between auto-CPV and surgical volume was small at (±s.d.) [95% confidence interval [CI]] 0.06 (0.24) [-0.41 to 0.54] cm3. The intraclass correlation (ICC) was strong at 0.91; 95% CI 0.86-0.94. Interobserver and intraobserver error was low with mean difference (±s.d.) [95%CI] 0.01 (0.26) [-0.5 to 0.5] cm3 and 0.03 (0.19) [-0.35 to 0.40] cm3 respectively. Both showed excellent ICC with narrow confidence intervals, ICC = 0.90; 95% CI (0.85-0.94) and ICC = 0.95; 95% CI (0.92-0.96). Auto-CPV measurement took 43% the time of manual planimetry; median (IQR) 05:39 (01:58) minutes compared to 13:05 (04:15) minutes, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Auto-CPV assessment is accurate, reproducible, and significantly faster than manual planimetry. Improved feasibility means that the utility of CPV can be assessed in large population studies to stratify risk in asymptomatic carotid disease or assess response to medical treatment.

Prospective evaluation of acute cerebral injury by DW-MRI following transcarotid artery revascularization using a double-layer micromesh stent.

BACKGROUND: Transcervical carotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has demonstrated a low overall stroke rate in carotid artery stenting (CAS). Furthermore, the use of a double-layer micromesh stent is expected to reduce embolization and plaque prolapse. The combination of TCAR and the double layer stent may lead to improved results compared to previously reported outcomes. The objective of this study is to present the findings of a prospective study including patients treated with the Roadsaver stent and TCAR. METHODS: Between January 2017 and May 2022, 85 patients were enrolled. Every patient underwent TCAR with the Roadsaver stent. As per our protocol, a neurological examination and an ultrasound were performed within 24 hours before and after the procedure, and again 30 days after. A diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was conducted 24 hours before the procedure and 48-72 hours after the procedure. The primary endpoint was the detection of new ischemic lesions on postoperative DW-MRI. The secondary endpoint was a composite of all strokes, death, and myocardial infarction within 30 days. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (75.29%) were symptomatic, out of which 25 were treated within 14 days of the onset of the symptoms. Pre and postprocedural DW-MRI were performed in 83 patients. Postprocedural lesions were found in nine patients (10.84%). There were no strokes or death within 30 days, but two patients experienced a myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the use of TCAR and the Roadsaver stent could be a safe alternative to carotid endarterectomy because it entails a low incidence of cerebral embolization, even in recently symptomatic and elderly patients.

The dosage of thiopental as pharmacological cerebral protection during non-shunt carotid endarterectomy: A retrospective study.

Background: Thiopental has been used as a pharmacological cerebral protection strategy during carotid endarterectomy surgeries. However, the optimal dosage required to induce burst suppression on the electroencephalogram (EEG) remains unknown. This retrospective study aimed to determine the optimal dosage of thiopental required to induce burst suppression during non-shunt carotid endarterectomy. Methods: The Neurological Institute of Thailand Review Board approved the study. Data were collected from 2009 to 2019 for all non-shunt carotid endarterectomy patients who received thiopental for pharmacological cerebral protection and had intraoperative EEG monitoring. Demographic information, carotid stenosis severity, intraoperative EEG parameters, thiopental dosage, carotid clamp time, intraoperative events, and patient outcomes were abstracted. Results: The study included 57 patients. Among them, 24 patients (42%) achieved EEG burst suppression pattern with a thiopental dosage of 26.3±10.1 mg/kg/hr. There were no significant differences in perioperative events between patients who achieved burst suppression and those who did not. After surgery, 33.3% of patients who achieved burst suppression were extubated and awakened. One patient in the non-burst suppression group experienced mild neurological deficits. No deaths occurred within one month postoperative. Conclusions: The optimal dosage of thiopental required to achieve burst suppression on intraoperative EEG during non-shunt carotid endarterectomy was 26.3±10.1 mg/kg/hr.

Predictors of hemodynamic instability during and persistent after carotid artery stenting.

OBJECTIVES: The risk factors for post-carotid artery stenting severe hemodynamic instability remain elusive. This study aimed to identify the predictors of severe hemodynamic instability during and persisted after carotid artery stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent carotid artery stenting for extracranial carotid artery stenosis at a single-center between September 2018 and July 2021 were retrospectively assessed. The predictive factors of severe hemodynamic instability intraoperation and post-operation were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 139 patients included, 63 experienced severe hemodynamic instability, with 45 and 18 cases occurring intra and postoperatively, respectively. Persistent was observed in 21 patients. Smoke exposure (odds ratio [OR], 2.38; p=0.039), carotid bifurcation stenosis (OR, 0.91; p=0.018), and large-diameter balloon (>4 mm) dilatation (OR, 11.95; p<0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for hemodynamic instability at any stage of carotid artery stenting. Intraoperatively, large-diameter balloon (>4 mm) dilatation was associated with an increased risk of hemodynamic instability occurrence (OR, 4.67; p=0.01), whereas general anesthesia (OR, 0.19; p=0.001) and a longer distance from the stenosis to the carotid bifurcation (OR, 0.89; p=0.01) were negatively associated with hemodynamic instability. Furthermore, smoking exposure (OR, 3.73; p=0.03), large diameter balloon dilatation (OR, 6.12; p=0.032), distance from stenosis to bifurcation (OR, 0.85; p=0.047) and long-stent (40 mm) implantation (OR, 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.95]; p=0.007) could independently predict persistent hemodynamic instability. CONCLUSION: Patients with a smoking history, lesions near the carotid bulb, or dilatation using a large-diameter balloon were most likely to suffer severe hemodynamic instability. General anesthesia can protect against severe hemodynamic instability only intraoperatively. Long-term stent implantation may reduce persistent hemodynamic instability.

[Treatment experience of neck tumor surgeries involving carotid artery].

Objective:To investigate surgical treatment of carotid artery diseases in neck tumor surgery. Methods:A retrospective analysis of the clinical data on carotid artery treatment was conducted in the five cases of neck tumor surgeries treated at Department of Surgical Oncology, the First Peoples Hospital of Lanzhou from March 2010 to May 2020. Surgical methods, including carotid artery resection and ligation, tumor-involved artery resection and vascular reconstruction, and tumor peeling and carotid rupture repairing were used, respectively. Results:Five cases were successfully operated on. One case of carotid artery ligation was followed by intermittent dizziness and decreased contra-lateral limb strength after the surgery. The remaining patients exhibited no neurological complications. A patient with cervical low-grade myofibroblastoma developed into lung metastases 8 months after the surgery. Another patient with cervical lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid cancer developed into lung metastases 24 months after the surgery. Conclusion:Currently, surgical methods for clinical treatment of diseased carotid arteries include carotid artery resection and ligation, simple tumor peeling, tumor invasion artery resection and vascular reconstruction, and interventional therapy. Each surgical method has its own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, the choice of treatment depends on the patient's specific conditions, physician's clinical experience, and the equipment available.

Comparison of Carotid Blood Flow Measured by Ultrasound and Cardiac Output in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: In general, cerebral blood flow accounts for 10-15% of cardiac output (CO), of which about 75% is delivered through the carotid arteries. Hence, if carotid blood flow (CBF) is constantly proportional to CO with high reproducibility and reliability, it would be of great value to measure CBF as an alternative to CO. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct correlation between CBF and CO. We hypothesized that measurement of CBF could be a good substitute for CO, even under more extreme hemodynamic conditions, for a wider range of critically ill patients. METHODS: Patients aged 65-80 years, undergoing elective cardiac surgery were included in this study. CBF in different cardiac cycles were measured by ultrasound: systolic carotid blood flow (SCF), diastolic carotid blood flow (DCF), and total (systolic and diastolic) carotid blood flow (TCF). CO simultaneously was measured by transesophageal echocardiography. RESULTS: For all patients, the correlation coefficients between SCF and CO, TCF and CO were 0.45 and 0.30, respectively, which were statistically significant, but not between DCF and CO. There was no significant correlation between either SCF, TCF or DCF and CO, when CO was <3.5 L/min. CONCLUSIONS: Systolic carotid blood flow may be used as a better index to replace CO. However, the method of direct measurement of CO is essential when the patient's heart function is poor.

Radiation Dose and Fluoroscopy Time of Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenting : Elective vs. Emergency Treatment Including Combined Mechanical Thrombectomy in Tandem Occlusion.

PURPOSE: Fluoroscopically guided endovascular carotid artery stenting (CAS) of extracranial carotid stenosis (ECS) is a reasonable alternative to carotid endarterectomy in selected patients. Diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for this common neurointervention have not yet been defined and respective literature data are sparse. We provide detailed dosimetrics for useful expansion of the DRL catalogue. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study of patients undergoing CAS between 2013 and 2021. We analyzed dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time considering the following parameters: indications for CAS, semielective/elective versus emergency including additional mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in extracranial/intracranial tandem occlusion, etiology of ECS (atherosclerotic vs. radiation-induced), periprocedural features, e.g., number of applied stents, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and MT maneuvers, and dose protocol. Local DRL was defined as 75% percentile of the DAP distribution. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included (semielective/elective CAS n = 75, emergency CAS n = 8, CAS + MT n = 19). Total median DAP was 78.2 Gy cm2 (DRL 117 Gy cm2). Lowest and highest median dosimetry values were documented for semielective/elective CAS and CAS + MT (DAP 49.1 vs. 146.8 Gy cm2, fluoroscopy time 27.1 vs. 43.8 min; p < 0.005), respectively. Dosimetrics were significantly lower in patients undergoing 0-1 PTA maneuvers compared to ≥ 2 maneuvers (p < 0.05). Etiology of ECS, number of stents and MT maneuvers had no significant impact on dosimetry values (p > 0.05). A low-dose protocol yielded a 33% reduction of DAP. CONCLUSION: This CAS study suggests novel local DRLs for both elective and emergency cases with or without intracranial MT. A dedicated low-dose protocol was suitable for substantial reduction of radiation dose.

Major vascular traumas to the neck, upper limbs, and chest: Clinical presentation, diagnostic approach, and management strategies.

Major vascular traumas to the neck, upper limbs, and chest may arise from penetrating and/or blunt mechanisms, resulting in a range of clinical scenarios. Lesions to the carotid arteries may also lead to neurologic complications, such as stroke. The increasing use of invasive arterial access for diagnostic and/or interventional purposes has increased the rate of iatrogenic injuries, which usually occur in older and hospitalized patients. Bleeding control and restoration of perfusion represent the two main goals of treatment for vascular traumatic lesions. Open surgery still represents the gold standard for most lesions, although endovascular approaches have increasingly emerged as feasible and effective options, particularly for management of subclavian and aortic injuries. In addition to advanced imaging (including ultrasound, contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging, and arteriography) and life support measures, multidisciplinary care is required, particularly in the setting of concomitant injuries to the bones, soft tissues, or other vital organs. Modern vascular surgeons should be familiar with the whole armamentarium of open and endovascular techniques needed to manage major vascular traumas safely and promptly.

Patients with Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage Have Higher Incidence of Cerebral Microbleeds.

AIMS: Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) is considered a marker of plaque vulnerability. Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are recognized on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Any connection between carotid IPH and CMBs remains scantly investigated. This study aimed to determine whether the histologic evidence of carotid IPH is related to CMBs. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 101 consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with symptomatic (ischemic stroke, TIA, and amaurosis fugax) or asymptomatic ipsilateral carotid artery disease. The presence and the extent (%) of IPH were identified on carotid plaques stained with Movat Pentachrome. CMBs were localized on T2*-weighted gradient-recalled echo or susceptibility-weighted imaging sequence on brain MRI before surgery. The degree of carotid stenosis was measured by neck CTA. RESULTS: IPH was identified in 57 (56.4%) patients, and CMBs were found in 24 (23.7%) patients. CMBs were more commonly observed in patients with carotid IPH compared to those without [19 (33.3%) vs 5 (11.4%); P=0.010]. The carotid IPH extent was significantly higher in patients with CMBs than in those without [9.0 % (2.8-27.1%) vs 0.9% (0.0-13.9%); P=0.004] and was associated with the number of CMBs (P=0.004). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated an independent association between carotid IPH extent and the presence of CMBs [OR 1.051 (95% CI 1.012-1.090); P=0.009]. Additionally, patients with CMBs had a lower degree of ipsilateral carotid stenosis compared to those without [40% (35-65%) vs 70% (50-80%); P=0.049]. CONCLUSIONS: CMBs may be potential markers of the ongoing process of carotid IPH, especially in those with nonobstructive plaques.

A Multicenter Analysis of Revision of Aneurysmal Dialysis Access Using Bovine Carotid Artery Conduit.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis access complications and failure requiring revision are common. Understanding which methods of revision yield the optimal patency rates and lowest complications remain in evolution. Revision of native vessels is preferred, with revision using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft as an alternative. Revision with Bovine Carotid Artery Graft (Artegraft) has historically been indicated when other options have been exhausted. While earlier studies demonstrated lower patency and higher infection rates compared to ePTFE, more recent studies have suggested otherwise. We describe our experience with patients who underwent arteriovenous access revision with Artegraft, and present this as a viable alternative. METHODS: A multicenter analysis was conducted over 6 years of 25 patients with arteriovenous access complications requiring revision. Complications included aneurysmal degeneration, bleeding, recurrent thrombosis, and sclerotic outflow. Patients were grouped into 2 groups based on the complication. The first group included aneurysm-only complication and the second group included aneurysm and all other complications. All patients underwent revision of their arteriovenous fistula with excision of diseased segment of the arteriovenous fistula and interposition placement of Artegraft. All patients were followed long term and assessed for postop complications, patency, and any reintervention. RESULTS: Of 25 patients, 13 were male and 12 female. Average age was 57 (range 27-83). Sixteen of the 25 patients had follow-up. Of the 16, 10 patients had primary patency (62.5%), 3 with primary-assisted patency (18.75%), and 3 with failure of grafts (18.75%). Ten of the 16 had at least 1 year or greater follow-up (5 with primary patency, 3 primary-assisted patency, and 2 with failure both of which failed after 1 year). Those that required intervention to maintain patency were from thrombosis requiring declot or anastomotic stenosis requiring angioplasty. None of the followed patients were found to have neither postoperative surgical site nor graft infections. CONCLUSIONS: This case series supports that arteriovenous access revision with Artegraft is a viable option that has acceptable patency rates (81% overall functional patency rate at 1.5 years), with an observed 0% infection rate, and is comparable to ePTFE. With more recent studies suggesting Artegraft may have superior outcomes, further study and consideration should be given to using Artegraft as a conduit for arteriovenous fistula revision.

Effects of plaque characteristics and artery hemodynamics on the residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has become an alternative strategy to carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis. Residual stenosis was an independent risk factor for restenosis, with the latter affecting the long-term outcomes of CAS. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the echogenicity of plaques and hemodynamic alteration by color duplex ultrasound (CDU) examination and investigate their effects on the residual stenosis after CAS. METHODS: From June 2018 to June 2020, 454 patients (386 males and 68 females) with a mean age of 67.2 ± 7.9 years, who underwent CAS from 11 advanced stroke centers in China were enrolled. One week before recanalization, CDU was used to evaluate the responsible plaques, including the morphology (regular or irregular), echogenicity of the plaques (iso-, hypo-, or hyperechoic) and calcification characteristics (without calcification, superficial calcification, inner calcification, and basal calcification). One week after CAS, the alteration of diameter and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated by CDU, and the occurrence and degree of residual stenosis were determined. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and during the 30-day postprocedural period to identify new ischemic cerebral lesions. RESULTS: The rate of composite complications, including cerebral hemorrhage, symptomatic new ischemic cerebral lesions, and death after CAS, was 1.54% (7/454 cases). The rate of residual stenosis after CAS was 16.3% (74/454 cases). After CAS, both the diameter and peak systolic velocity (PSV) improved in the preprocedural 50% to 69% and 70% to 99% stenosis groups (P < .05). Compared with the groups without residual stenosis and with <50% residual stenosis, the PSV of all three segments of stent in the 50% to 69% residual stenosis group were the highest, and the difference in the midsegment of stent PSV was the largest (P < .05). Logistic regression analysis showed that preprocedural severe (70% to 99%) stenosis (odds ratio [OR], 9.421; P = .032), hyperechoic plaques (OR, 3.060; P = .006) and plaques with basal calcification (OR, 1.885; P = .049) were independent risk factors for residual stenosis after CAS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hyperechoic and calcified plaques of the carotid stenosis are at a high risk of residual stenosis after CAS. CDU is an optimal, simple and noninvasive imaging method to evaluate plaque echogenicity and hemodynamic alterations during the perioperative period of CAS, which can help surgeons to select the optimal strategies and prevent the occurrence of residual stenosis.

History of Carotid Artery Reconstruction around the World and in Japan.

Since ancient times, physicians have been aware of correlations between the carotid artery and consciousness; however, carotid stenosis was only recently identified as the cause of atherothrombotic ischemic stroke. In 1658, Wepfer described the first suggestion of a link between symptoms of cerebral arterial insufficiency and carotid pathology. In 1951, Fisher reported details of the symptoms and pathological findings and emphasized that cervical atheromatous lesions induced cerebral infarction with various symptoms. The beginning of carotid artery surgery was ligation of the carotid artery for neck or head injury, but surgeons were aware that this operation induced cerebral symptoms due to lack of blood supply. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was first reported by Eastcott et al. in 1954, and in Japan, Kimoto performed a successful CEA in 1962. In 1979, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was performed for patients with fibromuscular dysplasia, and then, carotid artery stenting (CAS) was first performed in 1989 by Mathias. In Japan, Kuwana et al. were the first to perform carotid PTA, in 1981, whereas Yamashita et al. performed the first CAS in 1997. Yoshimura et al. proposed staged carotid stenting to prevent hyperperfusion syndrome. Some issues in carotid reconstruction are still debated today, which include conventional (standard) CEA versus the eversion technique, CEA versus CAS versus medical therapy, and medical economic problems. In the future, we must continue to develop more effective, safer, and less expensive therapeutic methods to prevent carotid stroke, carrying on the efforts of the ancient peoples who pioneered this research.

[Carotid Artery Stenosis:Indications and Outcomes].

Carotid artery stenting(CAS)has emerged as a less invasive alternative to carotid endarterectomy(CEA), the standard surgical treatment for carotid artery stenosis. Major international randomized control trials(RCTs)have demonstrated its non-inferiority to CEA, and it is now recommended in the Japanese stroke treatment guidelines for both symptomatic and asymptomatic severe stenotic lesions. To ensure safety, it is essential to use an embolic protection device to prevent ischemic complications and maintain the quality of physicians proficient in both techniques and devices. In Japan, these two essentials are guaranteed with the aid of a board certification system by the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy. Furthermore, preprocedural carotid plaque evaluation using non-invasive methods such as ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging to detect vulnerable plaques, which are considered at high risk for embolic complications, is frequently performed, thereby determining therapeutic indications to avoid adverse events. Thus, the results of CAS in Japan are far superior to those of RCT abroad, making this procedure the first-line therapy for carotid revascularization for decades.

Procedural embolic protection strategies for carotid artery stenting: current status and future prospects.

INTRODUCTION: Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is an established procedure to treat carotid artery stenosis for either primary or secondary prevention of stroke. Randomized clinical trials have shown an increased risk of periprocedural cerebrovascular events with CAS compared with carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Several strategies have been proposed to mitigate this risk, including alternative vascular access site, proximal/distal embolic protection devices, and dual-layer stents, among others. AREAS COVERED: This review provides a general overview of current embolic protection strategies for CAS. The phases of the procedure which can affect the early risk of stroke and how to reduce it with novel techniques and devices have been discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Innovations in device technologies have dramatically improved the safety and efficacy of CAS. To minimize the gap with surgery, a thorough, patient-oriented approach should be pursued. Endovascular technologies and techniques should be selected on an individual basis to address unique lesion characteristics and vascular anatomies. Meticulous pre-procedural planning, both clinical and anatomical, is needed to assess the embolic risk of each procedure. Only by having an in-depth understanding of the wide range of available endovascular devices and techniques, the operator will choose the most appropriate strategy to optimize CAS results.